
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Pete: No 'Conflict' Diamonds In Ashlee's Ring

New Standards for Sierra Leone
The Diamond Development Initiative (DDI) announced the release of its Standards & Guidelines for Sierra Leone’s Artisanal Diamond Mining Sector on May 27th, 2008. The release, in partnership with Sierra Leone’s Network Movement for Justice and Development, is the first comprehensive guide to a sector that was until recently plagued by armed rebellion and horrific violence. Sierra Leone’s civil conflict serves as a troubled milestone in the history of conflict diamonds. Today, Sierra Leone is at peace, but the DDI finds that the diamond industry remains troubled. Despite the wealth they generate, artisanal diamond mining districts in Sierra Leone – as in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Brazil and elsewhere — are less developed, have greater health problems, more illiteracy and greater poverty than other areas. The Standards and Guidelines Project, carried out in conjunction with Partnership Africa Canada, with support from the Communities & Small Scale Mining Secretariat and several major diamond mining and retailing companies, has produced practical, relevant information, standards and guidelines for a wide cross-section of government departments, investors and development organizations. However, DDI's main objective is drawing development organizations and sound investment into artisanal diamond mining areas, to find ways to make development programming more effective, and to help bring the informal diamond mining sector into the formal economy.
Friday, May 23, 2008
As the Diamonds Spread

India's under developed economy has prevented their markets to seperate conflict from legitimate diamonds. Diamond sellers from bazaars faces a downfall in their business as certain processes have prohibited conflict diamonds from being sold. Some sellers claim that they cannot distinguish the origin of the diamonds and "business [here] is done with cash and no questions." India and its undeveloped state is depicted through their cracked pavements, tired workers and hundreds of black-market dealers. They smuggle conflict diamonds into the country in order to make a living, yet unable to realize the consequences which derive from such actions. Human suffering in Africa isn't the only problem which comes from blood diamonds, but these problems spread to other nations such as India. Blood diamonds are not usually a threat to the Indian government, but encourages the foul conditions of human (child as well) labor.
Sunday, May 18, 2008
De Beers' Conflicting Image
DeBeers, once a monopoly of diamond mining and manufacturing for a hundred years. It is a cartel of companies which participates in rough diamond explorations, mining and trade. The company was founded by Cecil Rhodes and the multiple companies within De Beers are responsible for about 40% of diamond production in the world. They have created an increase in the desire for diamonds with their famous slogan: "A diamond is forever." However, advocates play against this advertising line due to De Beers' success from conflict diamonds. Their diamond market derive from South Africa by British owners and own about 70% of diamond mines in Africa. The discovery of the Kimberley diamond fields in the late 1800s became a major source of De Beers' profit and rise to the company. The sudden renaissance of Kimberley has been attributed to new diamond discoveries in what De Beers regarded for years as worthless land – at least for mining. And that has fed rumors in the close-knit international diamond community that Kimberley has become a major laundering center for Africa's "conflict diamonds". Human rights groups accused it of purchasing illicit diamonds from African rebels as well. De Beers was placed in a troubled situation where their clean luxurious image have been tainted. De Beers seeks to improve their image by promoting new policies concerning conflict diamonds. Their policy applied to all of Africa: they would only purchase and trade legitimate diamonds which were not used to fund rebel groups. They also developed a zero-tolerance policy later in 1999 and stopped all outside trade and purchase of diamonds in order to guarantee their conflict free status of the company.

A fellow blogger comments on De Beers position on conflict diamonds:
"Let's not forget that the De Beers company has had a monopoly on diamond mining and manufacturing for a hundred years. I know... you already know these things. So why am I bothering to beat this dead horse? I am a media scholar, and it is the media aspect about diamonds that makes me so sick. If diamonds weren't overpriced status symbols, weren't harvested from mines by slaves under the stress of immeasurable brutality and suffering, if the polishing wasn't done by child labor, and if their manufacturing wasn't almost completely operated by a single corporation, I'd still have the following reason not to buy one."
De Beers Commercial
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Diamonds: The Real Story--National Geographic
Monday, May 12, 2008
Hip-Hop Takes on Conflict Diamonds

Lyrics to "Diamonds are Forever"
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Blood Diamond (Film)
